Board Thread:Announcements/@comment-4839682-20150204020747/@comment-5005434-20150206153502

I personally would advise against voting for anyone who's been here for 6 months or less. I don't believe that's enough time to prove someone is here for the long term. I agree active editors with good histories and considerable experience would be best, but deciding who should be a new B-crat should require a different set of qualifications. Being a good admin and being a good B-crat aren;t necessarily the same thing. Admins monitor, regulate, and adminstrate the wiki. B-crats are for these very situations, when people need to be promoted or demoted. For that we need someone who's been here a long time, knows the rules well, and knows the regulars around here as well as the history of the wiki to ensure mistakes aren't repeated and only the right people are in power. To this end, I still nominate Rig pr Angry for a new B-crat.